TENAFLY, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: COUNTY MANOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of COUNTY MANOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC in 113 COUNTY ROAD, TENAFLY, NJ 07670 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 338957806.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- 113 COUNTY ROAD
- City
- TENAFLY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07670
- Mailing
- 113 COUNTY ROAD, TENAFLY, NJ 07670
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 90
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 IV B
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure: (a) Establishment: Employees including but not limited to Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants and Recreational Assistants have exposure to blood and other potentially infectious material in the course of their work, but annual consideration and implementation of effective and safer medical devices to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure was not documented, thus potentially exposing employees to bloodborne pathogens on or about March 13, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.1030 C01 V
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls: (a) Establishment: Employees including but not limited to Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants and Recreational Assistants had exposure to blood and other potentially infectious material in the course of their work, but input regarding identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls were not solicited, thus potentially exposing employees to bloodborne pathogens, on or about March 13, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 F03 II A
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3)(ii)(A): The source individual's blood shall be tested as soon as feasible and after consent is obtained in order to determine HBV and HIV infectivity. If consent is not obtained, the employer shall establish that legally required consent cannot be obtained. When the source individual's consent is not required by law, the source individual's blood, if available, shall be tested and the results documented. (a) Establishment: The source individual's blood was not tested as soon as feasible after an employee was exposed to blood through a percutaneous injury, subsequently delaying provision of results and post-exposure re-evaluation and thus exposing the employee to bloodborne pathogens. Additionally the employer did not establish that legally required consent could not be obtained, on or about March 1, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.1030 F05
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(5): Healthcare Professional's Written Opinion. The employer shall obtain and provide the employee with a copy of the evaluating healthcare professional's written opinion within 15 days of the completion of the evaluation. (a) Establishment: A Licensed Practical Nurse reported a percutaneous injury from a needlestick but the employer did not provide the health care professional's written opinion for post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, therefore the employee may not have been informed about medical conditions that could have resulted from the exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials nor whether or not any further evaluations and treatment was required, thus potentially exposing the employee to illnesses from bloodborne pathogens on or about April 19, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.1030 F04 II D
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(4)(ii)(D): The employer shall ensure that the healthcare professional evaluating an employee after an exposure incident is provided the following information: Results of the source individual's blood testing, if available; a) Establishment: Medical records including but not limited to the source patient's blood test results were not provided to the employee's healthcare provider after a needlestick incident occurred, thus exposing the employee to potential illnesses from bloodborne pathogens, on or about March 1, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.1030 F01 II A
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that medical evaluations and procedures including the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series, post-exposure evaluation, or follow-up, including prophylaxis, were made available at no cost to the employee; (a) Establishment: A Licensed Practical Nurse reported a percutaneous injury from a needlestick but the employer did not ensure Post Exposure evaluation and follow-up including prophylaxis were made available to at no cost to the employee, the employee obtained treatment on her own time and was not compensated for the time by the employer, on or about March 5, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 F01 II B
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii)(B): Made available to the employee at a reasonable time and place; (a) Establishment: A Licensed Practical Nurse reported a percutaneous injury from a needlestick but the employer did not ensure Post Exposure evaluation and follow-up including prophylaxis were made available to at no cost to the employee, the employee traveled to Englewood Hospital and Hackensack University Medical Center's Center for Occupational Medicine, but was not compensated for the travel by the employer, on or about March 5, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 H01 II D
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(1)(i): The employer shall establish and maintain an accurate record for each employee with occupational exposure, in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020. 29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii): This record shall include: 29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(D): The employer's copy of the healthcare professional's written opinion as required by paragraph (f)(5); and a) Establishment: The medical records of employees with occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens did not include the employer's copy of the healthcare professional's written opinion on or about April 25, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 H05 I A
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(5)(i): The employer shall establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps. The information in the sharps injury log shall be recorded and maintained in such manner as to protect the confidentiality of the injured employee. The sharps injury log shall contain, at a minimum: 29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(5)(i)(A): The type and brand of device involved in the incident, a) Establishment: The type and brand of the device involved in the percutaneous injury was not recorded on the sharps injury log, on or about July 10, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1020 G01 I
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1): Upon an employee's first entering into employment, and at least annually thereafter, each employer shall inform current employees covered by this section of the following: 29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1)(i): The existence, location, and availability of any records covered by this section; a) Establishment: Employees were not made aware of the existence and availability of the records covered by this section and were not aware they had a right to a copy, on or about June 7, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338957806.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.