Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INC. in 5840 TULANE DRIVE, ATLANTA, GA 30336 (NAICS 311942). OSHA activity number 338959539.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mccormick & Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mccormick & Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5840 TULANE DRIVE
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30336
Mailing
5840 TULANE DRIVE, ATLANTA, GA 30336
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311942
Employees
165
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Sep 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances E200

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that caused or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that employees were exposed to combustible dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire hazards:         a) Production Area: The employer failed to ensure that an automatic spark detection system, fire suppression system, flame arrest or other means was used to detect and/or control a fire in the duct work and the dust collector. The duct work and dust collector were utilized to transport and capture fugitive mixtures of flour, sugar, salt and other combustible materials. Employees were exposed to a fire/explosion hazard while performing duties involving the manufacture of a variety of spices. A sample taken on March 05, 2013 was determined to be CLASS II combustible dust.        b) Production Area/Dust Collector: The employer failed to ensure that grounding and/or bonding was maintained on the ductwork and the dust collector to dissipate static electricity. The ductwork and dust collector were utilized to transport and capture fugitive mixtures of flour, sugar, salt and other combustible materials. Employees were exposed to a fire/explosion hazard while performing duties involving the manufacture of a variety of spices. A sample taken on March 05, 2013 was determined to be a class CLASS II combustible dust.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Jul 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances E200

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean.      a) Reconserve Room: The employer failed to ensure that the floor, cords, ledges, walls and equipment remained free from the accumulation of combustible dust. Employees performed duties involving the disposal of combustible spice dust and were exposed to a fire/explosion hazard while performing dumping of waste materials. The employees were dumping waste spices collected from the dust collector. A sample taken on March 05, 2013 was determined to be CLASS II combustible dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.     The employer failed to ensure that an eyewash and shower facility was available for employees that dispensed, utilized and handled injurious materials such as, but not limited to, lead/acid batteries and sodium hydroxide. Employees were exposed while performing maintenance, servicing and handling of 34 volt batteries and nearby sanitation activities to decontaminate surfaces, equipment and other articles.     a) Building 2: Forklift Charging Area did not maintained an eyewash/shower unit for exposed employees.     b) Building 1: Forklift charging area did not have a shower unit and the pressure on the eyewash was low.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.307 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances E200

29 CFR 1910.307(c): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location     Reconserve Room: The employer failed to ensure that all overhead lighting located and operated in a Division 1, Class II location was explosion proof and/or approved for the location. Employees were exposed to a fire/explosion hazard during operations involving the disposal of waste material. Florescent bulbs were utilized to provide lighting in the area. A sample taken on March 05, 2013 was determined to be a CLASS II combustible dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances E200

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    a) At McCormick & Company: The employer failed to ensure that employees were provided training on the hazards of combustible dust. Employees were exposed to a fire/explosion hazard while performing duties involving maintenance, sanitation, line operators, forklift opertions, reconserve and other duties for the manufacture of a variety of spices. A sample taken on March 05, 2013 was determined to be a CLASS II combustible diust.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

View Mccormick & Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338959539.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.