Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: SALVADOR ALEXANDER CARDONA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SALVADOR ALEXANDER CARDONA in 2135 QUEENS CHAPEL ROAD, NE, WASHINGTON, DC 20018 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 338960263.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Salvador Alexander Cardona for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Salvador Alexander Cardona is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2135 QUEENS CHAPEL ROAD, NE
City
WASHINGTON
State
DC
ZIP
20018
Mailing
9573 NITTANY DRIVE #404, MANASSAS, VA 20110
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact:   a) West Side of the Building on the Roof - A laborer was observed with head protection while passing a five gallon bucket of wet mortar up to his co-workers above him on the scaffold 8 feet high exposing him to a potential head injury, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   a) West Side of the Building on the Scaffold - Masons were observed with eye protection when installing concrete blocks using wet mortar exposing them to a potential eye injury, on or about 03/13/13.   b) West Side of the Building on the Scaffold - Laborers were observed with eye protection when mixing wet mortar exposing them to a potential eye injury, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.250 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.250(b)(1): Material inside building(s) under construction was stored within 6 feet of hoist way(s) or inside floor opening:    a) West Side of the Mezzanine Level - Materials used by the masons were stored on the mezzanine level directly at the edge of the floor exposing workers working below to a struck by hazard, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.300 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(3): The employer did not provide one or more methods of machine guarding to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are - barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.:    a) West Side of the Building on the Roof - A masons helper was observed using a mortar mixer where the guard was removed exposing him of the rotating parts of the mixer, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:   a) West Side of the Building on the Roof - A masons helper was observed using a portable 110 volt electric mixer which was protected with a ground fault circuit interrupter exposing him to an electrical shock, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.405 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.405(d): Panel boards mounted in cabinets, cutout boxes or enclosures designed for the purpose were not dead front:   a) West Side of the Building on the Ground Floor -- Masons were observed using 110 volt 30 amp receptacle locate directly to an unguarded 220 volt 200 amp electrical circuit panel  which was used to power the electric concrete mixer and was not protected against accidental contact exposing the masons to a potential electrical burns, shock and/or electrocution, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights is not fully decked:   a) West Side of the Building on the Roof - Several masons were observed on a tubular welded frame scaffold which was not fully decked exposing them to a 6 foot 6 inch fall hazard, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   a) West Side of the Building on the Roof - A  laborer was observed without fall protection while at the edge of the roof exposing him to a 12 foot fall hazard, on or about 03/13/13.   b) West Side of the Building on the Roof - A laborer was observed without fall protection while operating the cement mixer which was positioned only 7 feet from the roof's edge exposing him to a 12 foot fall, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights), more than six feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes:   a) West Side of the Building on the Roof - A laborer was observed working on the roof mixing mortar within 5 feet of an unguarded floor opening and walking over to the roof's edge within 2 feet of the unguarded floor holes exposing him to a 10 foot fall hazard, on or about 03/13/13.      b) West Side of the Building on the Roof - A mason's helper was observed without fall protection while operating the cement mixer which was positioned less than 5 feet from the unguarded floor holes exposing him to a 10 foot fall , on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:   a) West Side of the Building on the Roof - A masons helper was observed climbing through a window into the building where the window sill was measured to be 47 inches above the roof level exposing him to a fall hazard, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge:   a) Northeast Side of the Building Between the Ground Floor & the Mezzanine Levels - Masons and laborers were observed using the existing stairway which was not equipped with a handrail on either side of the stairs exposing them to an 8 foot 10 inch fall hazard, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:   a) West Side of the Building on the Mezzanine Level - A masons helper and a laborer were observed climbing through a window into the building and stepping onto a 6 foot step ladder was positioned exposing him to a fall hazard, on or about 03/13/13.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338960263.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.