FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: AL'S PLATING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AL'S PLATING COMPANY in 2829 BRYAN AVE., FORT WORTH, TX 76104 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 338960941.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AL'S PLATING COMPANY
- Site address
- 2829 BRYAN AVE.
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76104
- Mailing
- 2829 BRYAN AVE., FORT WORTH, TX 76104
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:Note: Toeboards are only required when persons can pass, there is moving equipment or there is equipment with which falling materials could create a hazard. a) On or about January 31, 2013, in the plating department, there was no toprail, midrail and toeboards around the entire storage area, exposing employees to the hazards of faliing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.133 A03
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses. a)On or about January 31, 2013, in the plating shop,employees who wore prescription lenses that were not ANSI approved safety glasses while removing plating racks from the dip tanks, exposing employees to the hazard of eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a) On or about January 31, 2013, in the plating shop, the electrical control panel had two unused openings not effectively closed, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): A log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300) and for the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300-A), and/or the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) or equivalent forms were not kept by the establishment: a) On or about january 31, 2013, at the establishment, a log of all work related injuries and illnesses (OSHA form 300), and /or the summary of work related injuries (OSHA 300-A), and/or the injury and illness incident report (OSHA form 301 or equivalent forms were not maintained within the establishment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $240
- — Z (O) $400
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate. a)On or about January 31, 2013, in the plating department, there was no load capacity sign attached to the 10ft. high overhead stroage area, exposing employees to the hazard of falling material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338960941.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.