Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GARCO RESTORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GARCO RESTORATION in 5050 NE LOOP 820, HALTOM CITY, TX 76117 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338969587.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Garco Restoration for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Garco Restoration is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GARCO RESTORATION
Site address
5050 NE LOOP 820
City
HALTOM CITY
State
TX
ZIP
76117
Mailing
4644 COOL RIDGE CT., FORT WORTH, TX 76133
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.403 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.  On or about March 18, 2013, the employer did not ensure the electrical conductors from the Makita saw were fully enclosed.  Employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.404 F06

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous.   On or about March 18, 2013, the employer did not ensure the path to ground was permanent and continuous on the 100 foot orange extension cord used by the employees working on the roof.  Employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).    On or about March 18, 2013, the employer did not ensure the employees who were performing roofing work were protected from falling.  The employees were exposed to a fall hazards of approximately 20 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigied support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist emmployees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.   On or about March 18, 2013, employees performing roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards when accessing the roof by the means of an extension ladder that was not 3 feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338969587.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.