HOUSTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: ADAN CORRUBIAS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ADAN CORRUBIAS in 648 WEST CROSS ST., HOUSTON, TX 77018 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 338970536.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ADAN CORRUBIAS
- Site address
- 648 WEST CROSS ST.
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77018
- Mailing
- 12003 GREEN BUTTE, HOUSTON, TX 77044
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: The employer does not ensure employees working in areas where there is a possibility of head injury from impact are protected by use of protective helmets. This violation was observed on or about March 21, 2013 on the east side of a newly built townhouse where an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a pneumatic nail gun while on a pump jack scaffold installing siding and cornice without wearing a hard hat. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees working in areas where there is a possibility of head injury from impact are protected by use of protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. The employer does not ensure employees wear eye protection when machines or operations present potential eye injury. This violation was observed on or about March 21, 2013 on the east side of a newly built townhouse where an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a pneumatic nail gun while on a pump jack scaffold installing siding and cornice without wearing safety glasses. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that protective eye equipment is used when machines or operations present potential eye injury.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. The employer does not protect employees from falling when working on a scaffold 10 feet above lower levels. This violation was observed on or about March 21, 2013, on the East side of a newly built townhouse where an employee was exposed to an approximately 12 foot fall hazard when installing cornice from Alum-A-Pole pump jack scaffold without a fall protection or guardrail system. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee ona scaffold more than 10 feet above lower levels are protected from falls by the use of a fall protection or guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2013
- Abate by
- May 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. The employer does not secure the poles to the structure at the bottom by triangular bracing or equivalent means. This violation was observed on or about March 21, 2013, on the East side of a newly built townhouse where an employee was exposed to an approximately 12 foot fall hazard when installing cornice from Alum-A-Pole pump jack scaffold without the three supporting poles being secure to the structure at the bottom. The poles were secured at the top only. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that poles are secured to thte structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent means at the bottom, top, or other points as necessary.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338970536.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.