RUTHERFORD, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: CUSTOM REMODELING BY JEFFREY IMHOFF
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CUSTOM REMODELING BY JEFFREY IMHOFF in 352 MONTROSS AVENUE, RUTHERFORD, NJ 07070 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 338971245.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CUSTOM REMODELING BY JEFFREY IMHOFF
- Site address
- 352 MONTROSS AVENUE
- City
- RUTHERFORD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07070
- Mailing
- 70 RAYMOND AVENUE, NUTLEY, NJ 07110
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: A) 352 Montross Avenue, Rutherford, NJ - An employee was exposed to head injuries while working below framing activities. The employee was not protected by a hard hat or protective helmet, on or about February 20th, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): A) 352 Montross Avenue - NJ: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25 feet while engaged in framing work on a residential structure. The employees were not protected by any type of fall protection system, on or about February 20th, 2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: A) 352 Montross Avenue, Rutherford - NJ: An employee was exposed to fall/ladder collapse hazards while using the top steps of a 6 foot folding step ladder, on or about February 20th 2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $640
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338971245.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.