FORT MITCHELL, AL ·
OSHA Inspection: RAFAEL BARRIOS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAFAEL BARRIOS in RIVERSIDE ESTATES, FORT MITCHELL, AL 36856 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 338971393.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAFAEL BARRIOS
- Site address
- RIVERSIDE ESTATES
- City
- FORT MITCHELL
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36856
- Mailing
- 1035 INDIAN TRAIL, DOUGLASVILLE, GA 30134
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. a) On March 20, 2013 and at times prior; the employer failed to provide eye protection to employees working with a nail gun.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was no protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. a) On or about March 20, 2013 and at times prior; the employer did not ensure a fall protection method was implemented and/or used while an employee was working at the roof area (framing) which exposed the employee to falls of 19 feet from the eave to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338971393.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.