FORT MCCOY, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: STEVE WILDER
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STEVE WILDER in 1654 SOUTH 11TH AVENUE, FORT MCCOY, WI 54656 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338972300.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEVE WILDER
- Site address
- 1654 SOUTH 11TH AVENUE
- City
- FORT MCCOY
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54656
- Mailing
- 11706 FLOWER ROAD, TOMAH, WI 54660
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. On or about March 21, 2013, individuals working on a low-sloped roof at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.503 A02 VIII
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(viii): The employer did not assure that each employee had been trained by a competent person qualified in the standards contained in subpart M: The individuals on site were not familiar with the OSHA fall protection standards and the requirements held within.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338972300.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.