Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: RMC USA, INC.,

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RMC USA, INC., in 149 SOUTH CUCUMBER ST., JEFFERSON, OH 44047 (NAICS 333120). OSHA activity number 338972680.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RMC USA, INC., for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RMC USA, INC., is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RMC USA, INC.,
Site address
149 SOUTH CUCUMBER ST.
City
JEFFERSON
State
OH
ZIP
44047
Mailing
149 SOUTH CUCUMBER ST., JEFFERSON, OH 44047
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333120
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized:  On April 11, 2013, the grinder/finisher in the Nabi cell was exposed to continuous noise levels at 279.0% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 90 dbA or equivalently, a dose of 100 percent), during the 450 minute sampling period. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled. 97.4 dBA   Abatement Steps:   1. Effective hearing protection shall be provided and used by all exposed employees as an interim protection measure and when administrative or engineering controls fail to reduce sound levels within the levels of table G-16.  In addition, an effective hearing conservation program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95(c) thru (n) shall be maintained.  Abatement must be completed (5 Working Days)   2. Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and /or administrative measures to control employee exposure to noise as referenced in this citation.  This plan shall include at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation.     a) Evaluation of engineering control options.  b) Selection of optimum control method and completion of design.  c) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures.  d) Testing and acceptance or modifications/redesign of controls.   All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a competent Industrial Hygienist or other technically qualified person.  Abatement must be completed (15 working days)   3. Abatement should have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance.  Abatement must be completed (30 working days)
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4500
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.95 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA:  On or about March 25, 2013, Nabi cell operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 293% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 85 dbA or equivalently, a dose of 50 percent), during the 450 minute sample period. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.       On or about March 25, 2013, Sleeper cell operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 94.3% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 85 dbA or equivalently, a dose of 50 percent), during the 436 minute sample period. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 44 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.95 G08 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(8)(ii)(B): Unless a physician determines that the standard threshold shift is not work-related or aggravated by occupational noise exposure, the employer did not ensure, when a standard threshold shift occurs, that for employees already using hearing protectors, employees be refitted and retrained in the use of hearing protectors and provided with hearing protectors offering greater attenuation if necessary:  On or about March 25, 2013, the employer did not refit and retrain employees with standard threshold shifts in the use of hearing protectors.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A05

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $3,600
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5): Fan blade guards, where the periphery of the blades was less than seven feet above the floor or working level, had openings larger than one half inch:    On or about March 25, 2013, employees in the sleeper cell area were exposed to an unguarded pedestal fan blade within 5 feet of their work station.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3600
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:    On or about March 25, 2013, employees using pedestal fans were exposed to an electrical shock hazard due to pedestal fans not being grounded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    On or about March 25, 2013, employees were exposed to struck by hazards when using a hose in the middle of the operations floor to clean off dust from parts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.134 E01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or before March 25, 2013, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employees required to wear half-face respirators when grinding.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  On or before March 25, 2013, the employer did not provide basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134 to employees voluntarily using dust masks when operating a grinder.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338972680.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.