Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO'S CONSTRUCTION LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ANTONIO'S CONSTRUCTION LLC in 67 ALLYNDALE DRIVE, STRATFORD, CT 06614 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338974082.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antonio'S Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antonio'S Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
67 ALLYNDALE DRIVE
City
STRATFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06614
Mailing
1822 COMMERCE DRIVE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06605
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels and 50-feet (15.25 m) wide or less, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety nets:    JOBSITE:  The employees, installing roof shingles on the low pitched roof (4 in 12) were not protected from the hazard of falling between 17 feet 7 inches to 24 feet 10 inches to the ground by the use of guardrails, personal fall arrest system or other equivalent means.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2800
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    JOBSITE:  The employees, exposed to the hazard of falling while installing roofing shingles on the low pitched roof (4 in 12 pitch) were not provided with information and training to control or minimize such hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.:  JOBSITE:  The employees, using an aluminum extension ladder to have access to an upper working level were not provided with information and training regarding the safe use and handling of the ladder.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)    JOBSITE:  The horizontal distance from the vertical support to the base of the 40 ft aluminum extension ladder which was used by the employees to access the roof of a house to perform work was more than one fourth (1/4) the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:    JOBSITE:  Employees were manually carrying roofing material while using an extension ladder to access the low pitched roof.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338974082.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.