Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: NORTH BELT EAST MEDICAL CLINIC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NORTH BELT EAST MEDICAL CLINIC in 530 NORTH SAM HOUSTON PARKWAY EAST SUITE 100, HOUSTON, TX 77060 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 338977341.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch North Belt East Medical Clinic for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for North Belt East Medical Clinic is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
530 NORTH SAM HOUSTON PARKWAY EAST SUITE 100
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77060
Mailing
530 NORTH SAM HOUSTON PARKWAY EAST SUITE 100, HOUSTON, TX 77060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Jul 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    The employer does not protect employees from illness or disease caused by exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials during the course of his or her work. This violation was observed on or about March 25, 2013; where the employer did not establish a written Exposure Contol Plan to eliminate or minimize employee exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten(10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to develop and implement a written Exposure Control Plan designed to elimnate or minimize employee exposure to pathogenic blood or other potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Jul 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure:    The employer does not protect employees from illness or disease caused by exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials found in the workplace. This violation was observed on or about March 25, 2013, in the clinic where the Hepatitis B vaccination was not offered to employees who were exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials within 10 working days of initial assignment.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten(10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all employees are provided the Hepatitis B vaccination within 10 working days of initial assigment to an area having occupational exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 H02 I D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2013
Abate by
Jul 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(2)(i)(D): Employee training records for bloodborne pathogens did not include the names or job titles of all persons attending the training sessions:  The employer does not protect employees from illness or disease caused by exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials found in the workplace. This violation was observed on or about March 25, 2013, in the clinic where the employer did not document the names or job titles of employees who have received bloodborne pathogen training.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten(10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure bloodborne training is properly documented for each employee having occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338977341.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.