PUEBLO, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: LA TOLTECA FOODS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LA TOLTECA FOODS, INC. in 720 W 8TH STREET, PUEBLO, CO 81003 (NAICS 311830). OSHA activity number 338987746.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LA TOLTECA FOODS, INC.
- Site address
- 720 W 8TH STREET
- City
- PUEBLO
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81003
- Mailing
- 720 W 8TH STREET, PUEBLO, CO 81003
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311830
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- May 16, 2013
- Abate by
- May 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: (a) On or about February 18, 2013, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees who poured, scooped and transported the corrosive ingredients hydrated lime, potassium sorbate and fumeric acid, were protected from chemical burns to the eyes by requiring protective eyewear. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: (a) On or about March 29, 2013, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees who handled corrosive ingredients such as hydrated lime, potassium sorbate and fumeric acid, were protected from chemical exposure by conducting and documenting a hazard assessment. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- May 16, 2013
- Abate by
- May 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) On or about March 29, 2013, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees who poured, scooped and transported the corrosive ingredients hydrated lime, potassium sorbate and fumeric acid, had access to eye wash stations. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 16, 2013
- Abate by
- May 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) On or about March 29, 2013, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees who clean the corn washer were protected from the auger running in reverse operation at the outlet of the corn shoot which is required during cleaning. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- May 16, 2013
- Abate by
- May 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Conductors entering boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasions: (a) On or about March 29, 2013, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from shock, burn and electrocution hazards by ensuring the wires to a timer and internal wires were protected from abrasion when they were closed in the door to the control panel for the corn flour mixer. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) On or about March 29, 2013, and at times prior, the employer had not developed and implemented a hazard communication program to protect employees who handle hazardous ingredients such as powdered hydrated lime, potassium sorbate and fumeric acid. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- May 16, 2013
- Abate by
- May 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A log of all recordable work-related injuries and illness (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent) was not completed in the detail required by the regulation: a) On or about March 27, 2013, and at times prior, the employer did not record information on the OSHA 300 log for the 2013 calendar year with the detail required in Column F: 1) Case 3556419 was missing the objects/substances that directly injured or made the people ill. 2) Case 3559957 was missing the description of the injury or illness.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) On or about March 29, 2013, and at times prior, the employer had not developed a respiratory protection program for required respirator use by employees handling powdered corrosive ingredients such as hydrated lime, potassium sorbate and fumeric acid. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at LA Tolteca Foods, INC.
View LA Tolteca Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311830)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338987746.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.