Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FANTAS EYES INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FANTAS EYES INC. in 380 BERGEN AVE., KEARNY, NJ 07032 (NAICS 424990). OSHA activity number 338988199.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fantas Eyes INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fantas Eyes INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FANTAS EYES INC.
Site address
380 BERGEN AVE.
City
KEARNY
State
NJ
ZIP
07032
Mailing
385 5TH AVE., NEW YORK, NY 10016
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424990
Employees
30
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3):  Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:   a) Establishment   The exit door access was blocked by stored merchandise.    Violation was occurred on or about 04/02/2013
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1575
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jul 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a) Establishment      The employer did not provide powered industrial truck training to an employee who did not have initial powered industrial truck training prior to his operation in the facility.          Violation was disclosed on or about 04/02/2013
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jul 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Establishment   The employer did not develop a hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acid (battery maintenance).       Violation was occurred on or about 04/02/2013
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jul 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Establishment    Employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees that were exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acid (battery maintenance).      Violation was occurred on or about 04/02/2013
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):  The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:   a) Establishment    Employees exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acid (battery maintenance) were not provided with MSDS information.      Violation was occurred on or about 04/02/2013
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338988199.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.