Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EMERALD CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of EMERALD CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION in 201 182 DRIVE, HALLANDALE BEACH, FL 33009 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 338991235.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Emerald Construction Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Emerald Construction Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
201 182 DRIVE
City
HALLANDALE BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
33009
Mailing
1086 NW 1 COURT, HALLANDALE BEACH, FL 33009
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2013
Abate by
Aug 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,000 Reduced
1926.501(b)(5): Formwork and reinforcing steel each employee on the face of formwork or reinforcing steel were not protected 6-feet or more to lower levels by personal fall arrest systems, safety net systems, or positioning device systems:      a. On or about April 2, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee who was not attached to an anchor point was exposed to a fall hazard while working from a sheer wall.         NOTE: ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $4000
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2013
Abate by
Aug 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:    a. On or about April 2, 2013 at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to impalement hazards while walking or working near unguarded reinforcing steel bars.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1960
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2013
Abate by
Aug 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person and shall be constructed and loaded in accordance with that design. Non-mandatory Appendix A to this subpart contains examples of criteria that will enable an employer to comply with paragraph (a) of this section:      a. On or about April 2, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while walking or working from a mobile scaffold which was equipped with nails instead of the manufacturer's cotter pins to secure uprights.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338991235.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.