Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ADAM CHAVEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ADAM CHAVEZ in 8901 ANTERES PARK DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43240 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 338994056.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Adam Chavez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Adam Chavez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ADAM CHAVEZ
Site address
8901 ANTERES PARK DRIVE
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43240
Mailing
1874 JOAN PLACE, COLUMBUS, OH 43221
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
May 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer is responsible for requiring the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions or where this part indicates the need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to the employees.  a. On the third floor balcony where employees were using air actuated nail guns to install guardrails, eye protection was not used, thereby exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
May 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent and continuous.  a. At the temporary electrical receptacle, the ground prong was missing from the extension cord that employees were using to provide power for a circular saw, thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
May 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Strain relief. Flexible cords shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.  a. On the north side of the building where employees were using extension cords for power to a circular saw, the strain relief clamp was pulled away from the outer insulation of the cord, thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2013
Abate by
May 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On the third floor balcony where employees were nailing lumber, fall protection was not used, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338994056.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.