Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MATSU ALABAMA, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MATSU ALABAMA, INC. in 9650 KELLNER ROAD SW, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35824 (NAICS 423120). OSHA activity number 338994155.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Matsu Alabama, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Matsu Alabama, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MATSU ALABAMA, INC.
Site address
9650 KELLNER ROAD SW
City
HUNTSVILLE
State
AL
ZIP
35824
Mailing
9650 KELLNER ROAD SW, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35824
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423120
Employees
154
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Abate by
Oct 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a) On or about 05/16/13 - Press Line Room, Press #1 through 11, tool & die maintenance employees were performing maintenance and servicing activities on dies in the danger zone area without pressses being locked and tagged out.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.217 B07 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 11 instances 35 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Abate by
Oct 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(iii): Fixing of the selection was not by means capable of supervision by the employer:  (a) On or about 05/16/13 - Press Line Room, Press # 1 through 11, press operators had their own keys, one key controlled numerious presses, and operators were able to change the press mode without supervision.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.217 C03 III F

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Abate by
Oct 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(3)(iii)(f): Mechanical power press(es) using presence sensing point of operation devices were not provided with guards to protect all areas of entry to the point of operation not protected by the presence sensing device(s):  (a) On or about 04/03/13 - Press Line Room, Press #10, the employer failed to effectively guard the point of operation on mechanical power presses to prevent employee injury.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.217 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Abate by
Oct 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): A program of periodic and regular inspections of mechanical power press(es) was not established and followed to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguards were in a safe operating condition and adjustment:  (a) On or about 04/03/13 - Press Line Room, Press #10, the employer failed to conduct effective press inspections to ensure all press safety devices and auxiliary equipment were in safe operating condition and properly adjusted.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.217 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Abate by
Oct 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.217(f)(2): Operator(s) were not trained and instructed in the safe method of work before starting work on mechanical power press(es):  (a) On or about 04/03/13 - Press Line Room, Press #10, the employer failed to properly train and instruct press operators in all the safe methods of manual transfer for press operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.217 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Abate by
Oct 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.217(f)(2): Supervision to ensure that correct operating procedures were being followed on mechanical power press(es) was inadequate:  (a) On or about 04/03/13 - Press Line Room, Press #10, supervisors did not ensure new operators and helpers were following correct operating procedures for "hands in die" stamping operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 26 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Abate by
Oct 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $4,000
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  (a) on or about 04/24/13 - Tool & Die Maintenance Shop, the employer failed to reduce compressed air nozzles used for cleaning metal parts to less than 30 p.s.i.  Air nozzles were used at 85 p.s.i.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $4000
  • — C (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.212 A01

Repeat Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Abate by
Oct 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $35,000 · Current $70,000
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) On or about 04/24/13 - Tool & Die Maintenance Shop, RD-1600 Sharp Radial Arm Drill, the rotating chuck was not guarded.      (b) On or about 04/24/13 - Tool & Die Maintenance Shop, Takang Turret Milling Machine, the rotating chuck was not guarded.    (c) On or about 04/24/13 - Tool & Die Maintenance Shop, Sharp Milling Machine, the rotating chuck was not guarded.    (d) On or about 04/24/13 - Tool & Die Maintenance Shop, KMA-3 Sharp-KMA Milling and Drilling Machine, the rotating spindle was not guarded.      Matsu Alabama, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.212 (a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314838608, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on 08/08/2011, with respect to a workplace located 9650 Kellner Road SW, Huntsville, Alabama.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $70000
  • — C (R) $35000
  • — Z (R) $35000

1904.29 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): Each recordable injury or illness was not entered on the OSHA 300 Log and on an incident report (OSHA Form 301 or equivalent) within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness had occurred:  (a) On or about 04/24/13 - Facility, the employer failed to record an amputation lost time accident for a temporary employee supervised by Matsu Alabama on the OSHA 300 Log within 7 days.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $1000
  • — C (O) $1000
  • — Z (O) $1000

View Matsu Alabama, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338994155.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.