Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GALPERTI INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GALPERTI INC. in 160 SOUTHBELT INDUSTRY DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77047 (NAICS 332919). OSHA activity number 338994585.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Galperti INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Galperti INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GALPERTI INC.
Site address
160 SOUTHBELT INDUSTRY DRIVE
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77047
Mailing
160 SOUTHBELT INDUSTRY DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77047
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332919
Employees
85
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:    Forge shop, and machine bay June 13, 2013, the employer did not conduct annual or frequent inspections of the energy control program to ensure the effectiveness, exposing employees to struck-by, amputations and caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C06 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(A): The periodic inspection of the energy control procedure was not performed by an authorized employee other than the one utilizing the energy control procedure being inspected:    Forge shop, and machine bay June 13, 2013, the employer did not insure that the employee conducting periodic inspection of the energy control program was and an authorized employee in the energy control program, exposing employees to amputations, caught-In and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 B05

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5): The rated load of crane(s) was not plainly marked on each side of the crane:     In the raw material yard, on June 13, 2013 and at times prior thereto; employees were using overhead cranes that were not properly labeled with load rating of crane, exposing employees to struck by hazards.         a) 20 ton overhead Galperti crane in raw material yard.             b) 10 ton overhead Galperti crane in raw material yard
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.184 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1910.184(d): Damaged or defective sling(s) were not immediately removed from service:     In the paint booth, on June 13, 2013 and at times prior thereto; employees working in the warehouse were using damaged synthetic slings to lift valves, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:         a) In the CNC machining area of the shop, on June 13, 2013, and at times prior thereto; employees were using a Rong Fu drill press model RF-30B Serial Number A36746 without a guard, exposing employees to struck by hazards.            b) In the CNC machining area of the shop, on June 13, 2013, and at times prior thereto; employees were using a Westward drill press serial number 1Ken4 without a guard, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.212 B

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,785
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:        a) In the CNC machining area of the shop, on June 13, 2013, and at times prior thereto; employees were using a Rong Fu drill press model RF-30B Serial Number A36746 that was not securely anchored, exposing employees to struck by hazards.          b) In the CNC machining area of the shop, on June 13, 2013, and at times prior thereto; employees were using a Westward drill press serial number 1Ken4 that was not securely anchored, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1785
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.219 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1910.219(b)(1): Flywheel(s) with parts seven feet or less above floor(s) or platform(s) were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iv)     Machine bay, June 13, 2013, the employer did not ensure that employees using a slant 450 chip remover that was attached to a VTC-20 CNC machine was properly guarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:     Maintenance shop floor June 13, 2013, the employer did not ensure that employees using a Dayton Industrial bench grinder work rest did not exceed maximum opening of one eight inch, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:     Maintenance shop floor June 13, 2013, the employer did not ensure employees using a Dayton Industrial bench grinder safety guard  peripheral member did not exceed one eight inch, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2100

View Galperti INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338994585.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.