ENOLA, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: LAPP CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LAPP CONSTRUCTION in LAUREL VALLEY LANE, ENOLA, PA 17025 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 338994916.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LAPP CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- LAUREL VALLEY LANE
- City
- ENOLA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 17025
- Mailing
- 160 PEEBLES ROAD, NEWBURG, PA 17240
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.28 A
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.28(a): Appropriate personal protective equipment was not worn by employee(s) in all operations where there was exposure to hazardous conditions: a) Roof - A framer operating a pneumatic nail gun was observed without eye protection, as referenced in 1926.102(a)(1), thereby exposed to possible eye injuries, on or about April 5, 2013. b) Roof - A framer operating a circular saw to make cuts into sheathing was observed without eye protection, as referenced in 1926.102(a)(1), thereby exposed to possible eye injuries, on or about April, 5, 2013. c) Job Site - Framers were observed walking under a roofing operation without head protection, as referenced in 1926.100(a)(1), thereby exposed to possible head injuries, on or about April 5, 2013. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $780
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.451 C02 IV
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use: a) Caterpillar TH63 Telehandler - Employees were observed working from a scaffold work platform placed on the forks of a Caterpillar TH63 telehandler in an elevated position. Caterpillar does not permit the use of access platforms for elevating personnel on TH63 models, on or about April 5, 2013. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: a) Caterpillar TH63 Telehandler - Employees were observed standing on a scaffold work platform 18 feet long x 4 feet wide that had not been designed by a qualified person, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet to the ground below, on or about April 5, 2013. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied: a) Caterpillar TH63 Telehandler - Employees were observed working from an elevated scaffold work platform and the platform was not securely attached to the Caterpillar TH63 telehandler exposing the employees to an approximate 20 foot fall hazard, on or about April 5, 2013. b) Caterpillar TH63 Telehandler - An employee was observed standing on an elevated scaffold work platform placed on the forks of a Caterpillar TH63 telehandler while the machine was being moved in reverse exposing the employee to a fall hazard, on or about April 5, 2013. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) Caterpillar TH63 Telehandler - Employees observed working from a scaffold work platform elevated by a Caterpillar TH63 Telehandler were not provided fall protection and were exposed to an approximate 20 foot fall hazard to the ground below, on or about April 5, 2013. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.602 C01 VI
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks. a) Caterpillar TH63 Telehandler - Employees were observed working from an elevated scaffold work platform placed on the forks of a Caterpillar TH63 telehandler. The operator had dismounted the telehandler leaving no one at the controls, employees were exposed to an approximate 20 foot fall hazard, on or about April 5, 2013. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Roof - Framers were observed working on a residential roof without fall protection and were exposed to a 20 foot fall hazard, on or about April 5, 2013. b) Laurel Ridge Estates, Unit 100 - Framers were observed working near a window opening without fall protection and were exposed to a fall up to 18 feet - 6 inches to the ground below, on or about April 5, 2013. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Lapp Construction
View Lapp Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338994916.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.