Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: BAILEY CONTRACTING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BAILEY CONTRACTING in 9204 FM 78, CONVERSE, TX 78109 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 338995400.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bailey Contracting for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bailey Contracting is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BAILEY CONTRACTING
Site address
9204 FM 78
City
CONVERSE
State
TX
ZIP
78109
Mailing
P.O. BOX 430, STOCKDALE, TX 78160
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
13
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.651 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2013
Abate by
Jun 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Employees were not protected from excavated or other materials or equipment that could pose a hazard by falling or rolling into excavations. Protection by placing and keeping such materials or equipment at least 2 feet from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that are sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary was not provided:         On or about April 8, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by and cave-in hazards while working inside an excavation assisting with installing a new pipe for the fire line to the building.  The trench measured approximately 6 feet in depth, 5 feet 4 inches in width, and 30 feet in length.  The spoils pile was approximately 1 foot from the edge of the trench.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2013
Abate by
Jun 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(b) or (c):         a)  On or about April 8, 2013, employee was exposed to cave-in hazards while installing a new fireline for the building inside an inadequately protected trench that was approximately 6 feet in depth, 20 feet in length, and 5 feet 4 inches in width.  The trench was inadequate because there was only 1 hydraulic shoring in place and only one set of finform.         b)  On or about April 8, 2013, employee was exposed to a cave-in hazard while installing a new fireline for the building inside an inadequately protected trench that was approximately 6 feet in depth, 20 feet in length, and 5 feet 4 inches in width.  The trench was inadequate because the single hydraulic shoring was more than 4 feet from the bottom of the trench.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.652 C02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2013
Abate by
Jun 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(c)(2)(iii): Manufacturer's specifications, recommendations, and limitations, and manufacturer's approval to deviate from the specifications, recommendations, and limitations were not in written form at the jobsite during construction of the protective system:         On or about April 8, 2013, an employee was exposed to cave-in hazards while installing a new fireline for the building inside an inadequately protected trench that was approximately 6 feet in depth, 30 feet in length, and 5 feet 4 inches in width.  The trench shoring was inadequate because there was only 1 hydraulic shoring in place and only one set of finform.  The trench shoring was also inadequate because the single hydraulic shoring was more than 4 feet from the bottom of the trench.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338995400.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.