Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: CONNECTICUT FAMILY DENTAL

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CONNECTICUT FAMILY DENTAL in 171 GRANDVIEW AVE, SUITE 103, WATERBURY, CT 06708 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 338995681.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Connecticut Family Dental for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Connecticut Family Dental is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
171 GRANDVIEW AVE, SUITE 103
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06708
Mailing
171 GRANDVIEW AVE, SUITE 103, WATERBURY, CT 06708
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621210
Employees
11
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  Facility: The employer did not conduct a site-specific workplace hazard assessment to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of  PPE for employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1030 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain at least the elements in 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (c)(1)(ii)(C):  Facility: The employer did not have an Exposure Control Plan that contained an exposure determination and other required elements.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:  Facility: The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens had training in accordance with the requirements to include initial and at least annual training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.37 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color:  Facility: The exit sign above the emergency exit door at the north end of the facility was not illuminated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.38 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:  Facility: The employer had more than ten employees and did not have a written emergency action plan.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:  Facility: The employer did not subject fire extinguishers to an annual maintenance check.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338995681.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.