Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: HARDMAN WHOLESALE, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HARDMAN WHOLESALE, LLC in 404 N. FIRST STREET, OSBORNE, KS 67473 (NAICS 423310). OSHA activity number 338996481.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hardman Wholesale, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hardman Wholesale, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
404 N. FIRST STREET
City
OSBORNE
State
KS
ZIP
67473
Mailing
P.O.BOX 10, OSBORNE, KS 67473
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423310
Employees
23
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $560 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(1): Every wall opening from which there is a drop of more than 4 feet was not guarded:   In the quonset building in the West end of the elevated storage area had an approximately 8 feet wide wall opening, exposing employees to falls of approximately 10 feet to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $560
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  The employer, who has provided a respirator to an employee, has not developed a written respiratory protection program, exposing the employee to an inhalation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  In the improvised painting area, the employer had not provided a qualitative fit test or quantitative fit test after providing a respirator to the employee, exposing the employee to a respirator hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  The employer did not provide training to the employee provided a respirator, exposing the employee to an inhalation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  The employer could not provide evidence of forklift training for the nine forklift operators, exposing employees to struck by injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s)  Near the dock, Caterpiller Forklift (Serial Number--5AM92894) had an inoperative horn, but had not been removed from service, exposing employees to a potential struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  Near the dock, the Caterpiller forklift (Serial Number--5AM92894) had been placed in service without being inspected, exposing employees to a potential struck by hazard in that the horn did not operate.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.213 B03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(b)(3): Provisions were not made to prevent woodworking machine(s) from automatically restarting upon restoration of power after power failure:  In the Wood Door Room, the Atlas Table Saw was not equipped with undervoltage protection, exposing employees to a laceration and amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $560 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:  In the Wood Door Room, the Atlas Table Saw was missing the previously equipped automatically adjusting hood, exposing employee(s) to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $560
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy  In the improvised paint area, a 110 VAC electrical outlet was missing a faceplate, exposing employees to a shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  The employee working in the improvised painting area had not received training on hazardous chemicals to properly address the hazards associated with paint and stain, which can cause inhalation and nervous system hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $240
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338996481.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.