Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GARY ROOF WORKS, INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GARY ROOF WORKS, INC in 37 WEST 116TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10026 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338996796.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gary Roof Works, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gary Roof Works, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
37 WEST 116TH ST
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10026
Mailing
439 WEST 48TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10036
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Two employee's working on a two-point light duty, rope suspension scaffold were not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system:      Location: 37 West 116 Street New York, NY, Rear of building, North East Corner.    On or about April 8, 2013    a) An employee was standing on top of the guardrail system while working 4 stories above the roof top below on a light duty two point suspended scaffold. Although wearing PFAS he was not tied off to any life line or scaffold rails.  By standing on the guardrail top rail he was now outside the protection zone. By not being tied off and by being outside the protection zone Employee was exposed to the hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1020
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,280 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(iv): Vertical lifelines, independent support lines, and suspension ropes shall not be attached to each other, nor shall they be attached to or use the same point of anchorage, nor shall they be attached to the same point on the scaffold or personal fall arrest system.      Location: 37 West 116 Street New York, NY    On or about April 10, 2013, and other times prior thereto, at the above location,      a) Two employees were working on a light duty, two point suspended scaffold; the safety lines being used by the employees did not have an independent anchorage point. Both the tie back lines and the safety lines were anchored to the same point on the parapet clamps.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1280
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels sufficient to protect employees below.    Location: 37 West 116th Street, New York, NY 10026. Rear of Building     On or About 04/8/2013    a).  Employees were working on a light duty suspension scaffold 4 stories above the lower roof without having required toe boards, safety netting or barriers to prevent the accidential falling of objects from the scaffold system above to the street/surface below.  Although the employee working on the roof area below was wearing appropriate PPE (Hardhat) the exposure to the hazard was greater because no toeboards were installed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1020
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2013
Abate by
May 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,280 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not ensure his employees, who work while on a scaffold, were properly trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used, and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.      Location: 37 West 116 Street New York, NY, rear of building.     On or About April 8, 2013, and other times prior thereto, at the above location,          a) Two employees were working on a light duty, two point suspended scaffold and were not trained to recognize hazards and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Employees worked on the scaffold which did not independent anchorage for personal fall arrest system, the scaffold did not have a toeboard and an employee stood on the guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1280
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338996796.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.