TENAFLY, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: SANDE FRAMING INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANDE FRAMING INC. in 33 OAK AVENUE, TENAFLY, NJ 07670 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339001190.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANDE FRAMING INC.
- Site address
- 33 OAK AVENUE
- City
- TENAFLY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07670
- Mailing
- 55 BRIARWOOD DRIVE, WARREN, NJ 07059
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. A) 33 Oak Avenue , Tenafly NJ: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using a nail gun. The employee was not protected by eye/face protection, on or about March 13th 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): A) 33 Oak Avenue , Tenafly NJ: An employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 15 feet while engaged in framing work on a residential structure. The exposed employee was not protected by any type of fall protection system, on or about March 13th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339001190.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.