OSHA Inspection: PHIL CRAIG

Issued

Apr 25, 2013

Abate by

May 1, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,530 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials and equipment by a competent person:    Employees were exposed to struck-by and overhead hazards and the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the site were performed by a competent person.

Issued

Apr 25, 2013

Abate by

May 1, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a):      29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury form impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    Employees were exposed to overhead hazards, such as, but not limited to, being struck in the head by roofing materials, because hard hats were not being worn.

Issued

Apr 25, 2013

Abate by

May 1, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:    Employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard while using pneumatic nailers and the employer did not ensure the use of proper eye protection.

Issued

Apr 25, 2013

Abate by

May 1, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,520 · Current $2,520

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):   Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.502(k) developed and implemented:  a.  An employee was exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection.  The employee was exposed to a fall distance of 10.5 feet.  b.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection.  The employees were exposed to fall distances of 14.6 feet and 20.2 feet.

Issued

Apr 25, 2013

Abate by

May 14, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potenitally exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities because of the lack of fall protection and the employer did not have a training program for fall hazards/protection and procedures to minimize fall hazards for the employees.

Issued

Apr 25, 2013

Abate by

May 1, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,530 · Current $1,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    An employee was exposed to a fall hazard because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof.  The employee was exposed to a fall distance of 10.5 feet.

Issued

Apr 25, 2013

Abate by

May 14, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii):   The employer did not ensure that each employees using ladders and stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all stariways and ladders:  An employee was exposed to a fall hazard because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof and the employer had not ensured that each employee had been trained by a competent person.