Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NEWARK REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of NEWARK REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE in 104 AVENUE C, NEWARK, NJ 07114 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 339009706.

Watch Newark Refrigerated Warehouse — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Newark Refrigerated Warehouse is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
104 AVENUE C
City
NEWARK
State
NJ
ZIP
07114
Mailing
104 AVENUE C, NEWARK, NJ 07114
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493120
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a) Old warehouse, new cooling system construction project    A written respiratory protection program was not established and implemented for maintenance employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators while cutting, jackhammering and cleaning up concrete during floor hole construction.  Personal monitoring on 4/19/13 indicated employees jackhammering and cutting were overexposed to crystalline silica. Eight hour Time Weighted Average exposures were 10.3 million particles per cubic foot (mppcf) for jackhammering, 1.5 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 6.94 mppcf and 11.3 mppcf for cutting, 1.1 times the PEL of 10.4 mppcf.  Zero exposure was assumed for unsampled periods of 38 and 7 minutes, respectively.      Violation occurred on or about 4/19/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Old warehouse, new cooling system construction project  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to maintenance employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators while cutting, jackhammering and cleaning up concrete during floor hole construction.  Personal monitoring on 4/19/13 indicated employees jackhammering and cutting were overexposed to crystalline silica.  Eight hour Time Weighted Average exposures were 10.3 million particles per cubic foot (mppcf) for jackhammering, 1.5 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 6.94 mppcf and 11.3 mppcf for cutting, 1.1 times the PEL of 10.4 mppcf.  Zero exposure was assumed for unsampled periods of 38 and 7 minutes, respectively.  Violation occurred on or about 4/19/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) Old warehouse, new cooling system construction project  Maintenance employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators while cutting, jackhammering and cleaning up concrete during floor hole construction were not fit tested prior to unitial use of the respirator.  Personal monitoring on  4/19/13 indicated employees jackhammering and cutting were overexposed to crystalline silica.  Eight hour Time Weighted Average exposures were 10.3 million particles per cubic foot (mppcf) for jackhammering, 1.5 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 6.94 mppcf and 11.3 mppcf for cutting, 1.1 times the PEL of 10.4 mppcf.  Zero exposure was assumed for unsampled periods of 38 and 7 minutes, respectively.  Violation occurred on or about 4/19/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators:  (a) Old warehouse, new cooling system construction project  Maintenance employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators while cutting, jackhammering and cleaning up concrete during floor hole construction were not provided effective training.  Personal monitoring on 4/19/13 indicated employees jackhammering and cutting were overexposed to crystalline silica.  Eight hour Time Weighted Average exposures were 10.3 million particles per cubic foot (mppcf) for jackhammering, 1.5 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 6.94 mppcf and 11.3 mppcf for cutting, 1.1 times the PEL of 10.4 mppcf.  Zero exposure was assumed for unsampled periods of 38 and 7 minutes, respectively.  Violation occurred on or about 4/19/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.55 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.55(a): Employee(s) were exposed to material(s) at concentrations above those specified in the Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants for 1970 of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists:    a) Old warehouse, new cooling system construction project, 7A North    An employee jackhammering concrete was exposed to respirable crystalline silica at 10.3 mppcf as an 8 hr. Time Weighted Average (TWA), which was 1.5 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 6.9 mppcf.  Zero exposure was assumed for 38 minutes not sampled.    Violation occurred on or about 4/19/13.      b) Old warehouse, new cooling system construction project, 7B North    An employee spraying water on a concrete saw during operation was exposed to respirable crystalline silica at 11.3 mppcf as an 8 hr. TWA which was 1.1 times the PEL of 10.4 mppcf.  Zero exposure was assumed for 7 minutes not sampled.    Violation occurred on or about 4/19/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.55 B

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.55(b): Equipment and technical measures used for controls were not first approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person:  a) Old warehouse, new cooling system construction project, 7A North  An employee was allowed to jackhammer concrete flooring without any type of engineering control.  The employee was exposed to respirable crystalline silica at 10.3 million particles per cubic foot (mppcf) as an 8 hr. Time Weighted Average (TWA) which was 1.5 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 6.9 mppcf.  Zero exposure was assumed for 38  minutes not sampled.    Violation occurred on or about 4/19/13.   b) Old warehouse, new cooling system construction project, 7B North  A company engineer had an employee spray hot water from a garden hose on a saw blade used by another employee to cut concrete flooring in a freezer.  The employee was exposed to respirable crystalline at 11.3 mppcf as an 8 hr. TWA which was 1.1 times the PEL of 10.4 mppcf.  Zero exposure was assumed for 7  minutes not sampled.  Violation occurred on or about 4/19/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339009706.