ITASCA, IL —
OSHA Inspection: ELLIS CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELLIS CORPORATION in 1400 W. BRYN MAWR AVENUE, ITASCA, IL 60143 (NAICS 333312). OSHA activity number 339011868.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELLIS CORPORATION
- Site address
- 1400 W. BRYN MAWR AVENUE
- City
- ITASCA
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60143
- Mailing
- 1400 W. BRYN MAWR AVENUE, ITASCA, IL 60143
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333312
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: Ellis Corporation did not develop and document specific energy control procedures, nor were lockout procedures utilized when performing servicing and maintenance on a variety of equipment including, but not limited to, shears and press brakes. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3430
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a. The point of operation was not adequately guarded as there was a 3/4 inch opening between the blades on the Accur Shear 127. b. The point of operation was not adequately guarded on the Accurpress 115 as there was a 2 3/4 inch opening between the dies. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3430
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.333 A
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized: Ellis Corporation did not employ safety-related work practices to prevent electric shock when performing live work on electrical panels. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3430
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Maintenance employee(s), who performed maintenance work on live electrical parts, 110 volts to 480 volts) was not supplied with nor required to wear appropriate electrical protective equipment, including but not limited to the following: a) rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors b) Arc-rated clothing such as arc-rated long-sleeve shirt and pants or arc-rated coverall c) Hearing protection (canal inserts) d) Arc-rated flash suit hood or balaclava Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 IV
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(iv): Employees exposed to the danger of head injury from electric shock or burns due to contact with exposed energized parts did not wear nonconductive head protection: A maintenance employee, who performs maintenance work on live electrical parts, 110 volt to 480 volts, was not supplied with nor required to wear non-conductive head protection, such as hard hats with die-electric properties, to protect against electrical shock, burns and arc flash/blast . Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 V
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face: A maintenance employee, who performs maintenance work on live electrical parts, 110 volt to 480 volts, was not supplied with and/or required to wear face protection. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Ellis Corporation
View Ellis Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333312)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339011868.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.