Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GERALD COUDEN HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GERALD COUDEN HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC. in 449 AMITY ROAD, WOODBRIDGE, CT 06525 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339014318.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gerald Couden Home Improvement LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gerald Couden Home Improvement LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
449 AMITY ROAD
City
WOODBRIDGE
State
CT
ZIP
06525
Mailing
76 BIRD LANE, MILFORD, CT 06460
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):      Jobsite:  An employee working on a roof overhang approximately 9 feet above ground was not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Jobsite:  An employee working on a roof overhang approximately 9 feet above ground level was not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:      Jobsite: The side rails of the Werner 16 foot aluminum extension ladder, used by an employee to gain access to a roof, did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339014318.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.