OSHA Inspection: STUCCO REVOLUTION

Issued

2013-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $1440.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

(a)  Stucco Revolution at 1690 Hwy 6 & 50, Fruita, CO 81521: On 4/10/13, the employer did not ensure the prefabricated scaffolding system had been inspected for visible defects by a competent person before use.  One employee was working from the top plank of a prefabricated scaffolding system on the east side of the building.  The guardrails were not in place and there were no base plates to support the scaffolding.  This condition exposed the employee to an approximate 14 foot fall hazard.             Abatement Note:  Concerning the requirements and duties of a competent person:       (1)  "Competent person" means one who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them.       (2)  The competent person must be able to carry out the tasks specified in the standard. In order to be able to carry out the tasks the competent person needs to have knowledge in the issues relating to the strength and structural integrity of the scaffold. A competent person must be fully knowledgeable about erecting, disassembling, moving, operating,   repairing, maintaining and inspecting the scaffold.

Issued

2013-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $1440.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:       (a)  Stucco Revolution at 1690 Hwy 6 & 50, Fruita, CO 81521: On 4/10/13, the employer did not ensure the working platform on the fabricated frame scaffold was fully planked in that only one plank was placed on the scaffold.  One employee was working from the top plank of a prefabricated scaffolding system on the east side of the building.   This condition exposed the employee to an approximate 14 foot fall hazard.

Issued

2013-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:        (a)  Stucco Revolution at 1690 Hwy 6 & 50, Fruita, CO 81521: On 4/10/13, the employer did not ensure that supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights were on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.  One employee was working from the top plank of a prefabricated scaffolding system on the east side of the building.  The scaffold poles were place on damp ground and did not have base plates or mud sills.  This condition exposed the employee to an approximate 14 foot fall hazard.

Issued

2013-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):  Each employee on a scaffold 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to the lower level:  (a)  Stucco Revolution at 1690 Hwy 6 & 50, Fruita, CO 81521: On 4/10/13, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from a fall from elevation in that guardrails or other suitable fall protection were not installed on the working platform of the scaffolding.  One employee was working from the top plank of a prefabricated scaffolding system on the east side of the building.  The guardrails were not in place and there were no other means of fall protection.  This condition exposed the employee to an approximate 14 foot fall hazard.

Issued

2013-04-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2):  Frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which secured vertical members together laterally:    (a)  Stucco Revolution at 1690 Hwy 6 & 50, Fruita, CO 81521: On 4/10/13, the employer did not ensure all brace connections were secured on the fabricated frame scaffold in use, in that cross braces on one side were missing on the top two levels of the scaffold.  One employee was working from the top plank of a prefabricated scaffolding system on the east side of the building.   This condition exposed the employee to an approximate 14 foot fall hazard.