Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: CONTAINER REPAIR SERVICE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CONTAINER REPAIR SERVICE in 730 BROAD STREET, EMMAUS, PA 18049 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 339016271.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Container Repair Service for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Container Repair Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
730 BROAD STREET
City
EMMAUS
State
PA
ZIP
18049
Mailing
730 BROAD STREET, EMMAUS, PA 18049
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332311
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered    a)  Top Of Containers:  Employees are conducting grinding work on top of containers, at a working height in excess of 8 feet above a lower level, without any means of fall protection, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:   a)  Inside Work Area - Employees are required to wear 3M half face respirators while conducting grinding and painting work without their employer establishing a respiratory protection program, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a)  Inside Work Area - Employees are required to wear 3M half face respirators while conducting grinding and painting work but have not had medical evaluations completed prior to their initial wear, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used:  a)  Inside Work Area - Employees are required to wear 3M half face respirators while conducting grinding and painting work, but had not received fit testing prior to their inital wear, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jun 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet:  (a) Outside Work Area - Oxygen and propane cylinders are stored together without separation, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $714
  • · Z (S) $1020

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  (a) Inside Building - a pendant style outlet, supplying power to a plasma cutter system, had an opening on the rear of the box exposing the energized parts, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   (a)  Throughout Facility - employees are using paints, with hazardous chemical contents, without a developed hazard communication program, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  (a)  Throughout Facility - employees are using materials as part of the production process without the material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use, on about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a)  Throughout Facility - employees are welding, grinding and painting containers using materials with hazardous chemical contents without receiving training on the hazardous chemicals, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(5): The employer did not evaluate the competency of the operator who had previously received training appropriate to the truck and working conditions encountered.    a)  Throughout Facility - forklift operators who have received training from other employers have not been evaluated to ensure compentency prior to their initial use of a forklift for their new employer, on or about 4/12/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339016271.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.