RANGELEY, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: RANGELEY LAKE BUILDERS SUPPLY CO., INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RANGELEY LAKE BUILDERS SUPPLY CO., INC. in 2742 MAIN STREET, RANGELEY, ME 04970 (NAICS 444190). OSHA activity number 339016842.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RANGELEY LAKE BUILDERS SUPPLY CO., INC.
- Site address
- 2742 MAIN STREET
- City
- RANGELEY
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04970
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 549, RANGELEY, ME 04970
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 444190
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 B01
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides: Upstairs Showroom - The open-sided floor, which exists when the doors for receiving materials are open, and which is 11' above the ground, was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet): Upstairs Showroom - The doorway used for material receiving did not have a sign indicating it was not an exit.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not maintained in a fully charged and operable condition: Dry Storage Warehouse - A portable fire extinguisher was not maintained in a fully charged condition.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not kept in their designated places at all times except during use: Dry Goods Warehouse - Four portable fire extinguishers were not kept in their designated places.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: At the Facility - The employer did not conduct monthly inspections of the portable fire extinguishers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: At the Facility - Annual maintenance checks of the portable fire extinguishers were not performed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace: At the Facility - The employer did not ensure that operators of powered industrial vehicles had completed the required formal instruction portion of the training.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): At the Facility - The employer had not certified that each operator of powered industrial trucks had been trained and evaluated as required by this standard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: Dry Goods Warehouse - A four receptacle, 110V, outlet box did not have a cover.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 444190)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339016842.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.