Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: ADM GRAIN RIVER SYSTEM, INC. A SUBSIDIARY OF ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ADM GRAIN RIVER SYSTEM, INC. A SUBSIDIARY OF ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY in 335 S. EMMBER LANE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53203 (NAICS 493130). OSHA activity number 339020711.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ADM Grain River System, INC. a Subsidiary of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ADM Grain River System, INC. a Subsidiary of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
335 S. EMMBER LANE
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53203
Mailing
W13136 COUNTY RD. KK, RIPON, WI 54971
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493130
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.24 F

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.24(f): Rise height and tread width were not uniform throughout any flight of stairs including any foundation structure used as one or more treads of the stairs:     (a)  The stairs leading to the office from the platform had the tread widths which were not uniform exposing employees to trip hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.137 B02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $4,000
29 CFR 1910.137(b)(2)(ii): Insulating equipment was not inspected for damage before each day's use and immediately following any incident that could reasonably be suspected of having caused damage:    (a)  Approximately 3 weeks prior to the inspection, the Salisbury electrical gloves were not tested prior to use when changing out fuses.  This exposed employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $4000

1910.137 B02 VIII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.137(b)(2)(viii): Electrical protective equipment was not subjected to periodic electrical tests in accordance with Tables I-5 and I-6:    (a)  The Salisbury Class 0 rubber electrical gloves was not tested at least every 6 months.  The last test was conducted in November 2011.  This exposed employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4000

1910.272 J01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2013
Abate by
Oct 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(j)(1): The employer did not develop and implement a written housekeeping program that established the frequency and the method(s) determined best to reduce accumulations of fugitive grain dust on ledges, floors, equipment, and other expose:    (a)  On the 5th floor, by the shaker screener cleaning was not performed as required by the implementation of a housekeeping program, exposing employees to combustible dust hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.146 E06

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(6): The employer did not retain each canceled entry permit for at least one year to facilitate the review of the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(14):   (a)  Permit-required confined space permits were not maintained for at least a year after entering space such as but not limited to:  dust collection system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:     (a) The employer did not review all energy control procedures to verify or ensure their accuracy.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339020711.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.