FLOMATON, AL —
OSHA Inspection: WHITE PALLET COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WHITE PALLET COMPANY in 79 UPPER CREEK ROAD, FLOMATON, AL 36441 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 339023269.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WHITE PALLET COMPANY
- Site address
- 79 UPPER CREEK ROAD
- City
- FLOMATON
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36441
- Mailing
- 79 UPPER CREEK ROAD, FLOMATON, AL 36441
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321920
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- May 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point of operation guards were not designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of their body in the danger zone during the operating cycle: a) Pallet Mill; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work within three feet of an unguarded saw blade on the Newman KM - 16 Saw.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.215 A01
- Issued
- May 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $867 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not used with safety guard(s): a) Maintenance Shop; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to operate a bench grinder with the side guard removed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $867
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- May 24, 2013
- Abate by
- May 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work; a) Maintenance Shop; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to operate a bench grinder with the work rest removed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- May 24, 2013
- Abate by
- May 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: a) Maintenance Shop; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to operate a bench grinder with the tongue guard removed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- May 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft: a) Pallet Mill; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to fracture and amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around an exposed unguarded projected shaft end on the Wheiter Band Saw that was not smooth and projected more than one and a half times the diameter of the shaft.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.243 C01
- Issued
- May 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $867 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) were used on portable grinder(s) which were not provided with safety guard(s) meeting the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1) through (c)(4)(a): a) Maintenance Shop; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to use a Harbor Freight Drill Master 4 1/2 inch Grinder with the guard removed. b) Maintenance Shop; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to use a Skill 9 inch Super Duty Grinder with the guard removed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $867
1910.305 D02
- Issued
- May 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,156 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(d)(2): Panel boards were not mounted in cabinets, cutout boxes, or enclosures approved for the purpose and were not dead front: a) Maintenance Shop; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to electrical hazards in that employees were allowed to operate breakers mounted in a cabinet with the front cover removed and was not dead front exposing live unguarded 120/220 volts AC electrical parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1156
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- May 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. a) Pallet Mill; On or about April 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to operate a powered industrial truck without the employer first ensuring the employee was competent to operate the equipment as demonstrated by the completion of the required training and evaluation specified in the regulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at White Pallet Company
View White Pallet Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321920)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339023269.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.