Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: MACNAUGHTON ENERGY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MACNAUGHTON ENERGY, LLC in 3-S TURKEY HILLS ROAD, EAST GRANBY, CT 06026 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339023350.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Macnaughton Energy, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Macnaughton Energy, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3-S TURKEY HILLS ROAD
City
EAST GRANBY
State
CT
ZIP
06026
Mailing
PO BOX 270, EAST GRANBY, CT 06026
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
9
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Dec 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    (a) 14  Flagstad Rd, West Hartford - On or about May 28, 2013, a written respiratory protection program was not developed and implemented to protect employees required to use MSA, half face, negative pressure respirators while using Dow Polyurethane Foam System, which contains isocyanates.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Nov 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9965

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    (a) 14  Flagstad Rd, West Hartford - On or about May 28, 2013, employees required to use MSA, half face, negative pressure respirators while using Dow Polyurethane Foam System, which contains isocyanates were not medically evaluated prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Nov 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9965

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  (Construction Reference 1926.103)    (a) 14  Flagstad Rd, West Hartford - On or about May 28, 2013, employees required to use MSA, half face, negative pressure respirators while using Dow Polyurethane Foam System, which contains isocyanates had not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Dec 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9965

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii) (Construction Reference: 1926.59):    (a) 14  Flagstad Rd, West Hartford - On or about May 28, 2013, the employer failed to develop and implement a hazard communication program. Employees worked with or were exposed to chemicals including, but not limited Dow Polyurethane Foam System, which contains isocyanates.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Nov 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9965

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    (a) 14  Flagstad Rd, West Hartford - On or about May 28, 2013, the employees who worked with hazardous chemicals had not received training on the hazards associated with the chemicals. Employees worked with or were exposed to chemicals including, but not limited to Dow Polyurethane Foam System, which contains isocyanates.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.405 A02 II E

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Dec 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(E): All lamps for general illumination shall be protected from accidental contact or breakage. Metal-case sockets shall be grounded.    (a) 14 Flagstad Rd, West Hartford - On or about May 25, 2013, a lamp used for illumination was not protected from breakage while in use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Nov 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9965

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees, and who has the authority to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them):    (a) Utility Truck (Ct Plate number 7056CR) - On or about May 25, 2013, the employer failed to maintain a safety program which provided for regular inspections of jobsites, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person. The utlity  truck contained defective or ungaurded equipment, not safe for use, available for ready use and some of which was being used during the inspection.    Unsafe equipment in use at the time of the inspection included a pendant drop lamp used for illumination that was not guarded to protect the bulb from breakage during use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Dec 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9965

29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    (a) 14  Flagstad Rd, West Hartford - On or about May 28, 2013, employees required to use MSA, half face, negative pressure respirators while using Dow Polyurethane Foam System, which contains isocyanates were not fit tested prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339023350.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.