Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: CONNECTICUT ORTHODONTIC SPECIALIST

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CONNECTICUT ORTHODONTIC SPECIALIST in 109 BOSTON POST RD, ORANGE, CT 06477 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 339023459.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Connecticut Orthodontic Specialist for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Connecticut Orthodontic Specialist is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
109 BOSTON POST RD
City
ORANGE
State
CT
ZIP
06477
Mailing
109 BOSTON POST RD, ORANGE, CT 06477
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621210
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:      Establishment: The employer did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan where employees were potentially exposed to bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.   Establishment:  The employer did not establish and implement a written hazard communication program where employees were required to handle and work with chemicals such as (but not limited to) developer, fixer, glutaraldehyde and removalon.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety data sheets.   Establishment: The employer did not provide effective training and information to the employees required to handle and work with chemicals such as (but not limited to), developer, fixer, glutaraldehyde and removalon.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F02 IV

Repeat 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2013
Abate by
Aug 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $200 · Current $140 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in appendix A:    Establishment: The employer did not ensure that the declination form for hepatitis B vaccination was signed by an employee.   The Connecticut Orthodontic Specialist was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard  29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 330066, citation number 1  item number 2b and was affirmed as a final order on 10/3/12 with respect to a workplace located at  109 Boston Post Road, Orange, CT 06477
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $140
  • · Z (R) $200

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.   Establishment: The employer did not verify though a written certification that the Workplace Hazard Assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) was appropriately conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment     Establishment: The employees, required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) were not provided with appropriate information and training on the PPE hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339023459.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.