DARIEN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: STONECRAFT & LANDSCAPING SERVICES LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STONECRAFT & LANDSCAPING SERVICES LLC in 1015 POST ROAD, DARIEN, CT 06820 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339025439.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STONECRAFT & LANDSCAPING SERVICES LLC
- Site address
- 1015 POST ROAD
- City
- DARIEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06820
- Mailing
- 14 SPRING HILL AVENUE 1ST FLOOR, NORWALK, CT 06850
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: JOBSITE: The employer had not developed and implemented a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Iron Clad Type S Masonry Cement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) JOBSITE: The employer did not maintain Material Safety Data sheets for chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Iron Clad Type S Masonry Cement, which employees were required to use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area: JOBSITE: The employer did not provide information and training on Hazard Communication program to employees who were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Iron Clad Type S Masonry Cement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: JOBSITE: The employees, were not protected by protective helmets from falling objects while walking/working underneath overhead work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports: JOBSITE: The platform of the fabricated frame scaffold, which an employee was laying concrete block was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. JOBSITE: The fabricated frame scaffold platform from which an employee was laying concrete block to a building was not provided with a safe means of access.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. JOBSITE: The fabricated frame scaffold from which an employee was laying concrete block was not erected under the supervision and direction of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 F14
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(14): Makeshift devices, such as but not limited to boxes and barrels, were used on top of scaffold platforms to increase the working level height of employees: JOBSITE: The employee laying concrete block worked from a makeshift plank/platform which was set on stacked concrete block set on the platform of the fabricated frame scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally: JOBSITE: The fabricated frame scaffold, which an employee was laying concrete block was missing cross braces.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. JOBSITE: The employee laying concrete block from the fabricated frame scaffold did not receive training and information to recognize and control hazards associated with scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.54 D
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.54(d): Standard laser warning placards were not posted in areas in which lasers were used: JOBSITE: The warning signs were not posted when a laser was in use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339025439.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.