Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: H&P HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of H&P HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC in 1026-1028 STATE STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339027419.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch H&P Home Improvement LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for H&P Home Improvement LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1026-1028 STATE STREET
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06604
Mailing
527 PACIFIC STREET APT 2, STAMFORD, CT 06902
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2013
Abate by
May 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):      Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that the employees who were performing roofing work on a steep roof approximately 22 feet above the ground were provided with and required to wear fall protection.
Recent events (3)
  • · A (S) $2800
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that all employees had been trained in the hazards associated with falling and the proper ways and procedures in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · A (S) $0
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2013
Abate by
May 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that the side rails of the aluminum extension ladder which was used by employees to access the roof extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (3)
  • · A (S) $2000
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2013
Abate by
May 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.     Worksite:  An aluminum extension ladder which was used by employees to gain access to the roof had several bent rungs as well as two missing feet, and the ladder as not removed from service.
Recent events (3)
  • · A (S) $2000
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339027419.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.