Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: ROLLO ADVANCED DESIGN CORP.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROLLO ADVANCED DESIGN CORP. in 58 PERSHING AVENUE, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12601 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 339027559.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rollo Advanced Design Corp. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rollo Advanced Design Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
58 PERSHING AVENUE
City
POUGHKEEPSIE
State
NY
ZIP
12601
Mailing
58 PERSHING AVENUE, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12601
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Aug 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) On or about 4//26/2013 at Alpha Abrasive Blasting, employees who powdercoated and applied wet paint to parts were required to wear tight fitting and supplied air respirators.  The employer did not develop an effective respiratory protection program that complied with the provisions of 134(c)(1)(i) through 134(c)(1)(ix).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Aug 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) On or about 4//26/2013 at Alpha Abrasive Blasting, employees who powdercoated and applied wet paint to parts were required to wear tight fitting and supplied air respirators were not provided a medical evaluation prior to wearing the respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Aug 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  (a) On or about 4//26/2013 at Alpha Abrasive Blasting, employees who powdercoated and applied wet paint to parts were required to wear tight fitting and supplied air respirators had not passed an appropriate qualitiative or quantitative fit test.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339027559.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.