Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: OGC CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of OGC CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 3319 W NATIONAL AVE., MILWAUKEE, WI 53215 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339029522.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch OGC Construction, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for OGC Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3319 W NATIONAL AVE.
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53215
Mailing
W171 N10330 WILDROSE LN, GERMANTOWN, WI 53022
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
24
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Abate by
Nov 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  The employer did not submit to the Agency documents to demonstrate the abatement for the following serious violations:    a) The employer did not submit a written respiratory protection program.  b) The employer did not provide documentation on medical evaluations provided to employees.  c) The employer did not provide documentation that employees were fit tested on respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)       (a) A written respirator program was not established and implemented.  Employees were required to use respirators during asbestos abatement activities at scattered sites during residential renovation.  Other employees were voluntarily allowed to use elastomeric half face respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $250
  • · C (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    (a)  Employees were not medically evaluated prior to respirator use.  Employees were required to use respirators during asbestos abatement activities at scattered sites during residential renovation.  Other employees were voluntarily allowed to use elastomeric half face respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $250
  • · C (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 F

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used: (Construction Reference 1926.103)  (a)  Employees were not fit tested before being issued a respirator.  Employees were required to use a respirators during asbestos abatement activities at scattered sites during residential renovation.  Other employees were voluntarily allowed to use elastomeric half face respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  (Construction Reference 1926.103)  (a)  Employees who were issued or allowed to wear a respirator were not given the basic advisory information on respirators of Appendix D of the Respiratory Protection Standard.  Employees were required to use respirators during asbestos abatement activities at scattered residential renovation sites.  Other employees were voluntarily allowed to use elastomeric respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View OGC Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339029522.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.