Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: VALLEY RADIATOR, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VALLEY RADIATOR, INC. in 95 ALBANY TPKE, CANTON, CT 06019 (NAICS 811113). OSHA activity number 339029795.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Valley Radiator, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Valley Radiator, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
95 ALBANY TPKE
City
CANTON
State
CT
ZIP
06019
Mailing
95 ALBANY TPKE, CANTON, CT 06019
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811113
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Oct 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Shop area: On or about April 29, 2013 a written respiratory protection porgram was not developed and implemented to protect employees required to use P100 respirators while providing assistance during the welding, soldering or brazing of radiators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):  Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a) North side of Shop Area: On or about April 29, 2013, the employer failed to provide quick drenching facilities for employees that work with Formula 12475, a corrosive chemical with a pH of 13, which contains sodium hydroxide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1025 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level:  (a) Shop floor - On or about April 29, 2013, the employer did not make an initial determination of lead exposure for employees who are exposed to lead while providing assistance during the welding, brazing or soldering of lead-containing radiators or associated components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1025 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025:   (a) Shop floor - On or about April 29, 2013, employees were not informed of the contents of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025 when potentially exposed to airborne lead at any level while providing assistance during the welding, brazing or soldering of lead-containing radiators or associated components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Oct 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Shop Area: On or about April 29, 2013, the employer failed to develop and implement a hazard communication program. Employees worked with chemicals including, but not limited to lead and Formula 12475, degreaser which contains sodium hydroxide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  (a) North side of Shop Area - On or about April 29, 2013, a 100 gallon boil out tank reported to contain Formula 6230, which contains sodium hydroxide, was not labeled, tagged or marked with its contents contained therein. Employees used the boil out tank to degrease radiators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  (a) North side of Shop Area - On or about April 29, 2013, a 100 gallon boil out tank reported to contain Formula 6230, which contains sodium hydroxide was not labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warning. Formula 6230 has a pH of 13 in 1 percent solution and is corrosive.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Oct 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Shop floor - On or about April 29, 2013, employees who worked with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to lead and Formula 12475, which contains sodium hydroxide, had not received training on the hazards associated with the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Valley Radiator, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339029795.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.