QUINCY, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: R P & G OF QUINCY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R P & G OF QUINCY, INC. in 1701 N 16TH STREET, QUINCY, IL 62301 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339030314.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R P & G OF QUINCY, INC.
- Site address
- 1701 N 16TH STREET
- City
- QUINCY
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62301
- Mailing
- 1701 N 16TH STREET, QUINCY, IL 62301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 29
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.217 B07 III
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(iii): Fixing of the selection was not by means capable of supervision by the employer. Employees were exposed to amputation hazards when operating the Warco press because the selector key was left in the machine and was not under supervisory control.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $5390
1910.217 B07 V A
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,390 · Current $3,773 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(v)(a): Each two-hand control for single stroke operations on mechanical power press(es) using part revolution clutches was not arranged by design, construction and/or separation so that the concurrent use of both hands was required: Employees operating the Warco press were exposed to amputation hazards and the two-hand control was not operating correctly, in that it allowed the press to cycle with the use of only one control button depressed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3773
- · Z (S) $5390
1910.217 C02 I A
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,390 · Current $3,773 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(2)(i)(a): Point of operation guard(s) on mechanical power press(es) did not prevent entry of hands or fingers into the point of operation by reaching through, over, under or around the guard(s): Employees operating the warco press were exposed to amputation hazards and the point of operation guard allowed the employees to reach under the guard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3773
- · Z (S) $5390
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Employees were required to wear a filtering facepiece when performing powder coating operations and the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Employees are required to wear filtering facepieces when performing powder coating operations and the employees have not been provided a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph: Employees are required to wear a filtering facepieces when performing powder coating operations and the employer did not assure that fit testing was performed prior to the use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii): Employees were required to wear a filtering facepiece when performing powder coating operations and the employer did not ensure that the employee was trained in the use and limitations of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form: Employees were required to wear filtering facepieces while performing powder coating operations and the employer had not performed an evaluation of the respiratory hazards in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.217 E01 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): The employer did not maintain a certification record of inspections which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the power press that was inspected. The employer did not keep and maintain written certification of inspections on the mechanical power presses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339030314.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.