Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: URGENT CARE SPECIALISTS LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of URGENT CARE SPECIALISTS LLC in 8210 SPRINGBORO PIKE, MIAMISBURG, OH 45342 (NAICS 621498). OSHA activity number 339030447.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Urgent Care Specialists LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Urgent Care Specialists LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8210 SPRINGBORO PIKE
City
MIAMISBURG
State
OH
ZIP
45342
Mailing
1105 SCHROCK ROAD SUITE 200, COLUMBUS, OH 43229
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621498
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain at least the elements in 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (c)(1)(ii)(C):    The employer did not insure that the written bloodborne exposure control plan included the following information:    a) Exposure Determination-evaluation of job classifications for exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials (opim);    b) Tasks and procedures that could involve blood exposure;    c) Determination of safe needle devices;    d) Procedures for laundering personal clothing if exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials;    e) Location where employees will receive medical treatment following an exposure incident;    f) Documentation of annual review of the program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.1030 C01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan:  The employer did not ensure that employees who were potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps were given the opportunity to evaluate and select safer needle devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that training provided to employees with occupational exposure met the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(A) through (g)(2)(ii)(B):    The employer did not ensure that employees such as but not limited to physicians and medical assistants received annual training according to 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(A-N).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.1030 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2013
Abate by
Jun 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure:    The employer did not ensure that engineering controls to minimize employee exposure had been implemented in that safer needle devices were not being used for all procedures that could expose employees to blood or other potentially infectious materials
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3825

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339030447.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.