Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: ANDERSON SWETT INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ANDERSON SWETT INC. in ROUTE 1, KENNEBUNK, ME 04043 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339032351.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Anderson Swett INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Anderson Swett INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANDERSON SWETT INC.
Site address
ROUTE 1
City
KENNEBUNK
State
ME
ZIP
04043
Mailing
15 VARNEY ROAD, NORTH BERWICK, ME 03906
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.304 F

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(f): Section 4.1.2(b) American National Standards Institute 01.1-1961, Safety Code for Woodworking Machinery as adopted by 29 CFR 1926.304(f):  Circular hand-fed ripsaws were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely encloses that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:    At the Jobsite - The 8 inch Dewalt table saw was not provided with a hood guard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.304 F

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.304(f): Section 4.1.2(b) American National Standards Institute 01.1-1961, Safety Code for Woodworking Machinery as adopted by 29 CFR 1926.304(f):  Circular hand-fed rip saws were not equipped with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:  At the Jobsite - The 8 inch Dewalt table saw was not provided with a spreader.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.304 F

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.304(f): Section 4.1.2(c) American National Standards Institute 01.1-1961, Safety Code for Woodworking Machinery as adopted by 29 CFR 1926.304(f):  Circular hand-fed rip saws did not have non-kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:  At the Jobsite - The 8 inch Dewalt table saw was not provided with non-kickback fingers.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.304 F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
May 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(f): Section 5.1.3.3 American National Standards Institute 01.1-1961, Safety Code for Woodworking Machinery as adopted by 29 CFR 1926.304(f):  Electrically driven equipment was not controlled with magnetic switches or other devices that would prevent automatic restarting of the machine after a power failure:    At the Jobiste - The electrically driven 8 inch Dewalt table saw was not provided with anti-restart protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
May 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:    At the Jobsite - The employer did not use either ground fault interrupters as specififed or an assured grounding program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339032351.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.