POCATELLO, ID ·
OSHA Inspection: AUTUMN RETFORD AND ROGER VALENTINE DBA A&R BUILDERS
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AUTUMN RETFORD AND ROGER VALENTINE DBA A&R BUILDERS in 2411 ANDREWS, POCATELLO, ID 83201 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 339034068.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AUTUMN RETFORD AND ROGER VALENTINE DBA A&R BUILDERS
- Site address
- 2411 ANDREWS
- City
- POCATELLO
- State
- ID
- ZIP
- 83201
- Mailing
- RR3, BOX 289A, BLACKFOOT, ID 83221
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238350
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) The employer did not provide certification of abatement for Citation 1, Item 1b (29 CFR 1926.100(a)) which was to be abated by 05/15/2013. b) The employer did not provide certification of abatement for Citation 1, Item 2a, instance (a) (29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)) which was to be abated by 05/21/2013. c) The employer did not provide certification of abatement for Citation 1, Item 2b (29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(i)) which was to be corrected by 06/05/2013. NOTE: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1926.28 A
- Issued
- May 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions or where this part indicates the need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to the employees: a) Residential jobsite: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto employees performing framing activities using a nail gun did not wear eye protection. Note) Abatement certification is NOT required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 9, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Residential jobsite: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto employees working on the ground did not wear hard hats when framing activities were being performed above. Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 9, 2013
- Abate by
- May 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a) South side of residential structure: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto an employee was exposed to a 10 foot fall hazard. The employee performed framing activities while on the exterior top plate without a fall protection system in place. b) Interior ground floor of residential structure: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto, a floor hole was not guarded. Employees were exposed to a 10 foot fall hazard to the concrete floor below. Note) Abatement certification IS required for instance (a). Note) Abatement certification is NOT required for instance (b).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.503 A02 I
- Issued
- May 9, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(i): Employees were not trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified to recognize the nature of fall hazards in the work area: a) Residential jobsite: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto employees did not recognize the potential hazards of working on the top plate and leaving a floor hole unguarded. Appropriate actions were not taken to minimize or eliminate these hazards. Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238350)
More inspections in ID
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339034068.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.