Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: AUTUMN RETFORD AND ROGER VALENTINE DBA A&R BUILDERS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AUTUMN RETFORD AND ROGER VALENTINE DBA A&R BUILDERS in 2411 ANDREWS, POCATELLO, ID 83201 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 339034068.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Autumn Retford and Roger Valentine DBA A&R Builders for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Autumn Retford and Roger Valentine DBA A&R Builders is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2411 ANDREWS
City
POCATELLO
State
ID
ZIP
83201
Mailing
RR3, BOX 289A, BLACKFOOT, ID 83221
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238350
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Sep 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a) The employer did not provide certification of abatement for Citation 1, Item 1b (29 CFR 1926.100(a)) which was to be abated by 05/15/2013.  b) The employer did not provide certification of abatement for Citation 1, Item 2a, instance (a) (29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13)) which was to be abated by 05/21/2013.   c) The employer did not provide certification of abatement for Citation 1, Item 2b (29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(i))  which was to be corrected by 06/05/2013.  NOTE: Abatement certification is required.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions or where this part indicates the need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to the employees:  a) Residential jobsite: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto employees performing framing activities using a nail gun did not wear eye protection.   Note) Abatement certification is NOT required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Abate by
May 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) Residential jobsite: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto employees working on the ground did not wear hard hats when framing activities were being performed above.   Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Abate by
May 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  a) South side of residential structure: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto an employee was exposed to a 10 foot fall hazard.  The employee performed framing activities while on the exterior top plate without a fall protection system in place.    b) Interior ground floor of residential structure: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto, a floor hole was not guarded.  Employees were exposed to a 10 foot fall hazard to the concrete floor below.    Note) Abatement certification IS required for instance (a).  Note) Abatement certification is NOT required for instance (b).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.503 A02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2013
Abate by
Jun 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(i): Employees were not trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified to recognize the nature of fall hazards in the work area:  a) Residential jobsite: On May 1, 2013 and at times prior thereto employees did not recognize the potential hazards of working on the top plate and leaving a floor hole unguarded.  Appropriate actions were not taken to minimize or eliminate these hazards.    Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339034068.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.