Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CURTIS STEEL COMPANY, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CURTIS STEEL COMPANY, LLC in 6504 HURST, HOUSTON, TX 77008 (NAICS 423510). OSHA activity number 339034134.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Curtis Steel Company, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Curtis Steel Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6504 HURST
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77008
Mailing
6504 HURST, HOUSTON, TX 77008
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423510
Employees
64
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  The employer does not ensure employees used a seatbelt when operating power industrial equipment. This violation was observed on or about May 1, 2013, in the Maintenance Shop where an employee was exposed to an ejection hazard when operating a forklift without donning a seatbelt.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that protective equipment is used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment are encountered.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):  The employer does not protect employees from live parts of electrical equipment operating at 50 volts or more were guarded against accidental contact during maintenance work.  This violation was observed on or about May 1, 2013, in the Main shop area where non qualified employees were exposed to an electrical hazard when employees were working around live electrical parts up to 460 volts without the live electrical parts being guarded by a cabinet/enclosure or by any other means.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more are guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.101 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.101(a): The employer did not determine that compressed gas cylinders under his control were in a safe condition to the extent that this could be determined by visual inspection:  The employer does not ensure that a nitrogen cylinder was placed in safe condition to the extent that it could be visually inspection. This violation was observed on or about May 1, 2013, in the Maintenance Shop where a nitrogen cylinder was positioned in a remote location near the rail car terminal without being noticed by visual inspection.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the employer determine that compressed gas cylinders under his control are in a safe condition to the extent that this could be determined by visual inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.101 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which was incorporated by reference as specified in 29 CFR 1910.6:  The employer does not ensure that the handling, storage and utilization of a nitrogen cylinder was in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1965.  This violation was observed on or about May 1, 2013, in the Maintenance Shop where a nitrogen cylinder was placed in a remote area without a valve cap.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that valve protection caps, where cylinders are designed to accept caps, were always in place, hand-tight, except when cylinders are in use or connected for use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2013
Abate by
Jun 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:  The employer does not secure a junction box with a closed facepiece.  This violation was observed on or about May 1, 2013, in the Main Shop where employees were turning on/off a light heater switch during woodworking without securing an opening of the junction box facepiece from making contact with a metal table.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings are provided with covers approved for the purpose.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Curtis Steel Company, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339034134.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.