MOUNT VERNON, NY —
OSHA Inspection: SANTOS ROOFING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANTOS ROOFING, INC. in 184 CLAREMONT AVE., MOUNT VERNON, NY 10552 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339034241.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANTOS ROOFING, INC.
- Site address
- 184 CLAREMONT AVE.
- City
- MOUNT VERNON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10552
- Mailing
- 49 MACQUESTEN PKWY., MOUNT VERNON, NY 10550
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $330 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about 5/1/2013, 184 Claremont Ave. a) The employees were not provided safety and health training as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $330
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $330 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): General. The employer shall use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors: On or about 5/1/2013, 184 Claremont Ave. a) The employees were not using a ground fault circuit interrupter while working with electrical equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $330
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $330 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent and continuous: On or about 5/1/2013, 184 Claremont Ave. a) The 75' extension cord used by employees had the ground pin broken off.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $330
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $330 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables shall not be used: On or about 5/1/2013, !84 Claremont Ave. a) The extension cord was frayed and defective.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $330
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- May 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502: Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On or about 5/1/2013, 184 Claremont Ave. a) The employees worked on the roof without fall protection. They were exposed to a 25' fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Santos Roofing, INC.
View Santos Roofing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339034241.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.