Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: WAITE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of WAITE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, LLC in 3443 N MAIN ST, EAST PEORIA, IL 61611 (NAICS 333120). OSHA activity number 339034357.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Waite Equipment Company, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Waite Equipment Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3443 N MAIN ST
City
EAST PEORIA
State
IL
ZIP
61611
Mailing
3443 N MAIN ST, EAST PEORIA, IL 61611
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333120
Employees
41
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring, motors, and other equipment outside of but within twenty (20) feet of any spray area, and not separated therefrom by partitions, produced sparks under normal operating conditions and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part for Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Locations:    Employees were exposed to fire hazards as the power receptacle next to the compressed air tank was not designed for Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Locations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Employees performing painting operations were required to wear 3M half mask respirators.  The employer did not maintain a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1470
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Employees performing painting operations were required to wear 3M half mask respirators.  The employer had not ensured each employee had received a medical evaluation prior to the respirator usage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Employees performing painting operations were required to wear 3M half mask respirators.  The employer had not ensured each employee had passed a respirator fit test prior to the respirator usage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  Employees performing painting operations were required to wear 3M half mask respirators.  The employer had not provided employees with training prior to their intial usage of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 G07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "No smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color backgrounds were not conspicuously posted at all spraying areas:   In the paint spray area the employer conduted spray painting operations using flammable paints and solvents.  The employer had not ensured that "No smoking" signs were posted in the spray area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2590

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Employees performing painting operations were required to use hazardous chemicals including paints containing xylene.  The employer did not maintain a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2590

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Employees performing painting operations were required to use hazardous chemicals including paints containing xylene.  The employer did not provide employees with training on hazardous chemicals prior to their initial job assignment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2590

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  Employees performing painting operations were required to use hazardous chemicals including paints containing xylene.  The employer did not ensure that the safety data sheets for these chemicals were readily accessible to employees in their work areas.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Waite Equipment Company, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339034357.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.