BRANFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: A-1 HOME SERVICES
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of A-1 HOME SERVICES in 81 LEETES ISLAND ROAD, BRANFORD, CT 06405 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339035107.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A-1 HOME SERVICES
- Site address
- 81 LEETES ISLAND ROAD
- City
- BRANFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06405
- Mailing
- 121 BIRDSAY AVENUE, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.304 D
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(d): Portable, power-driven circular saw(s) were not equipped with a guard above and below the base plate or shoe: Worksite: The lower, retractable guard on the Skilsaw 7 1/4 inch circular saw #5150 was not operational whereby the guard did not automatically and instantly return to the covering position when removed from the material being cut.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: Worksite: Each employee using electrically powered hand-held equipment and tools such as but not limited to circular saws were not provided with training on the recognition of hazards associated with using the tools and equipment and the means and/or methods to safely use the equipment and tools to minimize and/or eliminate unsafe conditions.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): Worksite: The 3 in 12 pitched roof with a 17 foot 6 inch eave to ground fall distance was not equipped with a guardrail system, personal fall arrest system, safety net system or an alternative fall protection measure/system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: Each employee engaged in residential roofing work were not provided with a training program to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the means/procedures to minimize and/or eliminate fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a ridgid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist emmployees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. Worksite: The Louisville model L-2121-32, type I, 32 foot ladder placed on the north side of the building and used to access the 17 foot 6 inch high, 3 in 12 pitched roof was not extended at least three above the eave of the roof and the ladder was not secured to prevent displacement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Worksite: Each employee was not provided with a ladder training program to recognize the hazards related to using portable ladders and the procedures/means to minimize and/or eliminate hazards associated with using portable ladders.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339035107.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.