KELLER, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JAVIER SOTO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAVIER SOTO in 701 RAPP, KELLER, TX 76244 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339039612.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JAVIER SOTO
- Site address
- 701 RAPP
- City
- KELLER
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76244
- Mailing
- 2236 TANGLEWOOD ST., MESQUITE, TX 75181
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about April 29, 2013, the employer did not provide personal protective equipment, such as hard hats to employees exposed to falling objects from employees working above.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents On or about April 29, 2013, the employer did not provide safety glasses to employees while cutting stone. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards from debris.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation. On or about April 29, 2013, the employer did not ensure the tubular welded frame scaffold had base plates. The employees were exposed to fall hazards due to scaffold failure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. On or about April 29, 2013, the employer did not ensure the tubular welded frame scaffold located on the back side of building was equipped with guardrails and end frames. The employees working on the scaffold were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcture, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. On or about April 29, 2013, the employer did not ensure the tubular welded frame scaffold had a ladder for employee access or egress. The employees were climbing the cross bracing and/or end frames to gain access to the scaffold. Employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Javier Soto
View Javier Soto's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339039612.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.