TYLER, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ESTES PLASTERING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ESTES PLASTERING in 3904 HIGHWAY 64, TYLER, TX 75703 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339042038.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ESTES PLASTERING
- Site address
- 3904 HIGHWAY 64
- City
- TYLER
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75703
- Mailing
- 16637 OLD JVILLE HIGHWAY C, TYLER, TX 75705
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. On or about August 15, 2013 and at times prior to, employees working on a single story commercial building were exposed to head injury while working in areas where overhead work was in progress such as but not limited to employees working on scaffolding.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): In addition to wearing hardhats the employer did not ensure that each employee on a scaffold was provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, or guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects. The employer also did not ensure that when the falling objects are too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected by any of the above-listed measures, it placed such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall and shall secure those materials as necessary to prevent their falling. On or about August 15, 2013 and at times prior to, employees working on a single story commercial building were exposed to head injury while working in areas where overhead work was in progress such as but not limited to employees working on scaffolding without toeboards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B01 I
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights is no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary. On or about August 15, 2013 and at times prior to, employees working on a single story commercial building were exposed to falls of approximately 11 feet to the ground below. Scaffolds were not fully planked or decked.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): The employer did not ensure that supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights were placed on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation. On or about August 15, 2013 and at times prior to, employees working on a single story commercial building were exposed to falls of approximately 11 feet to the ground below and being struck by scaffold parts. Scaffold legs were not equipped with base plates and mud sills to prevent penetration into ground causing the scaffold to collapse.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): The employer did not ensure that when scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was used. Cross braces shall not be used as a means of access. On or about August 15, 2013 and at times prior to, employees working on a single story commercial building were exposed to falls of approximately 11 feet to the ground below. No ladder or other safe means of access was provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level was protected from falling to that lower level. On or about August 15, 2013 and at times prior to, employees working on a single story commercial building were exposed to falls of approximately 11 feet to the ground below. A guardrail system or other form of fall protection was not provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. On or about August 15, 2013 and at times prior to, employees working on a single story commercial building were exposed to falls of approximately 12 feet to the ground below while walking and working from a roof. Fall protection was not provided or in place.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339042038.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.